🎯 Objective
To help learners master the structure, language, and balanced argumentation needed to write a high-scoring discussion essay with personal opinion for IELTS Writing Task 2.
📝 Sample Task 2 Question
Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university is to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
| Essay Requirements | Details |
|---|---|
| Word Count | Minimum 250 words (aim for 280-320) |
| Time Limit | 40 minutes |
| Task Type | Discuss both views + give your opinion |
| Structure | 4-5 paragraphs with balanced discussion |
📚 Complete Guide: Writing High-Scoring Discussion Essays with Opinion
Understanding Discussion Essays with Opinion
What is a Discussion Essay with Opinion? This type of essay requires you to present both sides of an argument fairly and objectively, then clearly state and justify your personal position. The key is maintaining balance while demonstrating critical thinking.
Key Phrases that Signal This Essay Type:
- "Discuss both views and give your opinion"
- "Discuss both sides and state your position"
- "Consider both perspectives and provide your viewpoint"
- "Examine both arguments and express your stance"
Effective Essay Structures
📝 Structure 1: Traditional 4-Paragraph
Paragraph 1: Introduction + thesis statement
Paragraph 2: Discuss first viewpoint objectively
Paragraph 3: Discuss second viewpoint objectively
Paragraph 4: Your opinion + conclusion
📝 Structure 2: Opinion-Integrated 4-Paragraph
Paragraph 1: Introduction + clear position
Paragraph 2: Opposing view + counter-argument
Paragraph 3: Your preferred view + strong support
Paragraph 4: Conclusion + reaffirm position
🎯 Introduction Formula
Hook: General statement about the topic
Context: Background information
Paraphrase: Restate the question in your words
Thesis: Preview both views + your stance
🏁 Conclusion Formula
Summary: Recap both perspectives briefly
Restatement: Clearly reaffirm your position
Justification: One key reason for your choice
Implication: Broader significance (optional)
Step-by-Step Writing Process
Step 1: Analyze the Question (3 minutes)
- Identify the two opposing viewpoints clearly
- Understand what each side believes and why
- Consider your personal stance on the issue
- Think of examples and evidence for both sides
Step 2: Plan Your Position (2 minutes)
- Decide which view you personally support
- List 2-3 strong arguments for your position
- Identify 1-2 valid points from the opposing view
- Plan how to acknowledge but counter opposing arguments
Step 3: Write Balanced Discussion (30 minutes)
- Present each viewpoint objectively and fairly
- Use equal development for both perspectives
- Include specific examples and evidence
- Maintain neutral tone until opinion section
Step 4: Express Clear Opinion (5 minutes)
- State your position unambiguously
- Provide compelling reasons for your choice
- Address potential counterarguments
- End with a strong, memorable conclusion
Essential Language for Discussion Essays
✅ Objective Discussion Language:
- Presenting views: Proponents argue, Critics contend, It is claimed that
- Being neutral: From this perspective, According to this view
- Balancing: On one hand... on the other hand, While X argues... Y maintains
- Opinion markers: In my view, I firmly believe, From my perspective
❌ Biased/Weak Language:
- Obviously, Clearly (shows bias)
- I think, I feel (too weak/personal)
- Everyone knows (overgeneralization)
- Some people say (too vague)
- It's wrong/right (too absolute)
- In my country (too specific)
Sophisticated Opinion Language:
Strong agreement: "I am firmly convinced that," "It is my contention that"
Partial agreement: "While I acknowledge the merit of X, I lean toward Y"
Nuanced position: "Although both views have validity, I believe X outweighs Y"
Conditional opinion: "In most circumstances, X proves more beneficial, though Y may apply when..."
Balancing Objectivity and Opinion
✅ High-Scoring Balance:
- Equal word count for both viewpoints
- Objective tone in discussion paragraphs
- Specific examples for each perspective
- Clear personal position with reasoning
- Acknowledgment of opposing view's merits
- Sophisticated counter-argumentation
❌ Low-Scoring Imbalance:
- Heavily favoring one side from the start
- Dismissing opposing views as "wrong"
- Weak or underdeveloped counter-arguments
- Unclear or missing personal opinion
- Biased language in discussion sections
- Repetitive or circular reasoning
🧩 Task: Improve the Weak Discussion Essay with Opinion
Read the student's essay about university education purposes. Identify problems and suggest improvements.
📝 Student's Essay Response:
University education is important in today's world. Some people think universities should focus on job skills while others think they should teach knowledge. I will discuss both views and give my opinion.
Some people believe universities should teach workplace skills because students need jobs after graduation. Companies want employees who can work immediately without extra training. For example, engineering students should learn practical skills like using computer programs. This view makes sense because education costs a lot of money and students want good jobs.
However, I think the other view is wrong. Universities should teach knowledge for knowledge's sake. This means students should learn about philosophy, history, and literature because these subjects make people smarter and more cultured. Pure knowledge is more important than just getting a job. Students can learn job skills later at work.
In conclusion, I believe universities should focus on pure knowledge rather than workplace skills. This is better for society because educated people make better decisions and contribute more to culture.
1. ❌ What makes this essay unbalanced and biased? Identify specific problems.
2. ❌ What language problems weaken the academic tone and argumentation?
3. ✅ Rewrite the second body paragraph to present the workplace skills view more objectively and thoroughly.
4. ✅ Write a paragraph expressing your opinion while acknowledging the merit of the opposing view.
5. ✅ Rewrite the introduction with proper academic language and clear thesis statement.
✅ Answer Key & Explanation
1. ❌ Balance and Bias Problems:
Issues:
- Unequal development: First view gets 4 sentences, second view gets dismissive treatment
- Immediate bias: States "the other view is wrong" - not objective discussion
- Weak argumentation: Doesn't explore the academic knowledge view thoroughly
- Missing counter-arguments: Doesn't address potential weaknesses of preferred position
- Superficial analysis: Lacks depth in exploring either perspective
2. ❌ Language Problems:
Problem 1: Informal language ("makes sense," "wrong") - needs academic tone
Problem 2: Weak opinion markers ("I think") - should use stronger academic expressions
Problem 3: Basic vocabulary and simple sentences - lacks sophistication
Additional issues: Poor transitions, repetitive structure, missing objective discussion language
3. ✅ Improved Workplace Skills Paragraph:
"Advocates of employment-focused higher education argue that universities must adapt to contemporary economic realities and labor market demands. From this perspective, institutions should prioritize developing practical competencies, technical expertise, and industry-relevant skills that enhance graduates' employability and economic prospects. Proponents cite the substantial financial investment students make in their education, often accumulating significant debt, which necessitates tangible career returns. Furthermore, employers increasingly seek candidates who can contribute immediately to organizational productivity without extensive additional training. Countries like Germany and Singapore have demonstrated success with education systems that emphasize practical skills and industry partnerships, resulting in low graduate unemployment rates and strong economic performance."
4. ✅ Nuanced Opinion Paragraph:
"While I acknowledge the practical merits of employment-focused education, particularly in addressing immediate economic needs and reducing graduate unemployment, I am firmly convinced that universities should prioritize intellectual development and critical thinking over narrow vocational training. Although job-specific skills remain important, they can be acquired through professional development and on-the-job training, whereas the analytical reasoning, ethical foundation, and broad knowledge base developed through liberal education cannot be easily replicated in workplace settings. Moreover, universities that focus exclusively on current market demands risk producing graduates ill-equipped for a rapidly evolving economy where adaptability and creative problem-solving prove more valuable than specific technical skills that may become obsolete."
5. ✅ Improved Introduction:
"The fundamental purpose of higher education has become increasingly contentious as universities face mounting pressure to demonstrate practical value in an economically competitive global landscape. While pragmatists argue that institutions should prioritize employment-ready skills and industry-relevant training, traditionalists maintain that universities should preserve their role as centers of intellectual inquiry and knowledge preservation. This essay will examine both perspectives before arguing that universities should primarily focus on developing critical thinking and broad knowledge, while incorporating selective practical elements to enhance graduate competitiveness."
Why this works: Clear context, balanced presentation of both views, sophisticated vocabulary, specific thesis with nuanced position
🏆 Band 8+ Model Discussion Essay with Opinion
📝 Complete Model Essay (309 words):
Introduction:
The fundamental purpose of higher education has become increasingly contentious as universities face mounting pressure to demonstrate practical value in an economically competitive global landscape. While pragmatists argue that institutions should prioritize employment-ready skills and industry-relevant training, traditionalists maintain that universities should preserve their role as centers of intellectual inquiry and knowledge preservation. This essay will examine both perspectives before arguing that universities should primarily focus on developing critical thinking and broad knowledge, while incorporating selective practical elements to enhance graduate competitiveness.
Body Paragraph 1 (Workplace Skills View):
Advocates of employment-focused higher education argue that universities must adapt to contemporary economic realities and labor market demands. From this perspective, institutions should prioritize developing practical competencies, technical expertise, and industry-relevant skills that enhance graduates' employability and economic prospects. Proponents cite the substantial financial investment students make in their education, often accumulating significant debt, which necessitates tangible career returns. Furthermore, employers increasingly seek candidates who can contribute immediately to organizational productivity without extensive additional training. Countries like Germany and Singapore have demonstrated success with education systems that emphasize practical skills and industry partnerships, resulting in low graduate unemployment rates and strong economic performance.
Body Paragraph 2 (Academic Knowledge View):
Conversely, defenders of traditional academic education contend that universities should maintain their commitment to intellectual development and knowledge advancement regardless of immediate practical applications. According to this viewpoint, higher education serves a broader societal function by cultivating critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and cultural literacy that transcend specific occupational requirements. Supporters argue that many groundbreaking innovations and social progress have emerged from theoretical research and abstract thinking that initially appeared commercially irrelevant. Liberal arts education, for instance, develops communication skills, analytical capabilities, and adaptability that prove valuable across diverse career paths and enable graduates to navigate an unpredictable economic landscape.
Opinion and Conclusion:
While I acknowledge the practical merits of employment-focused education, particularly in addressing immediate economic needs, I firmly believe that universities should prioritize intellectual development over narrow vocational training. Although job-specific skills remain important, they can be acquired through professional development, whereas the analytical reasoning and broad knowledge base developed through liberal education cannot be easily replicated in workplace settings. The most successful approach combines rigorous academic foundation with selected practical applications, ensuring graduates possess both intellectual depth and professional competency.
🌟 Why This Essay Scores Band 8+:
- ✅ Task Response: Fully discusses both views and provides clear, well-reasoned opinion
- ✅ Balance: Equal development of both perspectives with objective tone
- ✅ Coherence: Logical progression from balanced discussion to personal stance
- ✅ Language: Sophisticated academic vocabulary and complex structures
- ✅ Examples: Specific references (Germany, Singapore, liberal arts)
- ✅ Argumentation: Acknowledges opposing merits while defending position
- ✅ Conclusion: Synthesizes discussion with nuanced compromise solution
🔑 Key Language Features:
Objective Discussion: "Advocates argue," "From this perspective," "According to this viewpoint"
Opinion Markers: "I firmly believe," "While I acknowledge," "I am convinced that"
Sophisticated Vocabulary: "contentious," "pragmatists," "transcend," "proliferation"
Complex Structures: "While X argues...," "Although Y remains important...," "Countries that have demonstrated..."
📊 Discussion Essay Structure Analysis:
Balanced Word Distribution:
• Introduction: 72 words (23%)
• Workplace view: 78 words (25%)
• Academic view: 76 words (25%)
• Opinion/Conclusion: 83 words (27%)
Tone Progression:
• Paragraphs 1-3: Objective, neutral, balanced
• Paragraph 4: Personal, confident, reasoned
Opinion Integration:
• Acknowledges opposing view merits
• Provides clear personal stance
• Offers compromise solution
💡 Discussion Essay Writing Strategies:
- 🎯 Equal treatment rule: Give both views similar depth and word count
- 📝 Objective presentation: Present each view as its supporters would
- 🤔 Critical analysis: Evaluate strengths and weaknesses objectively
- 💪 Strong opinion: Take a clear position with solid reasoning
- 🔄 Acknowledge opposition: Show understanding of other view's merits
- 🎭 Avoid absolutes: Use nuanced language rather than extreme positions
- 📈 Synthesize ideas: Look for ways to combine the best of both views
🏅 Common Discussion Topics for Practice:
Education: Traditional vs. online learning, standardized testing, private vs. public schools
Technology: Social media impact, automation benefits/risks, privacy vs. security
Work: Remote vs. office work, work-life balance, job security vs. flexibility
Environment: Individual vs. government responsibility, economic growth vs. conservation
Society: Cultural preservation vs. globalization, tradition vs. modernity
Health: Preventive vs. treatment medicine, alternative vs. conventional treatments
📝 Essential Opinion Language Bank:
Strong Opinion: "I am firmly convinced," "It is my contention," "I strongly advocate"
Qualified Opinion: "I tend to believe," "I am inclined to think," "I generally favor"
Acknowledging Opposition: "While I recognize," "Although I understand," "Despite the merits of"
Presenting Views: "Proponents maintain," "Critics argue," "Supporters contend"
Balancing Ideas: "On one hand... on the other," "While X claims... Y asserts"
Nuanced Positions: "In most cases," "Generally speaking," "Under certain circumstances"
⚖️ Achieving Perfect Balance Checklist:
- ☑️ Equal paragraph length for both viewpoints
- ☑️ Similar number of supporting points for each view
- ☑️ Specific examples for both perspectives
- ☑️ Objective language in discussion paragraphs
- ☑️ Clear personal opinion with reasoning
- ☑️ Acknowledgment of opposing view's strengths
- ☑️ Sophisticated academic vocabulary throughout
- ☑️ Logical transitions between ideas
- ☑️ Strong conclusion that synthesizes discussion